NEW COSMETIC PLASTIC SURGERY BOARD CERTIFICATION FOR ELIGIBLE SPECIALIST PLASTIC SURGEONS New Board aims to address lack of consumer trust and confidence choosing qualified surgeons
With
Dr Scott Ingram, Specialist Plastic Surgeon, Taringa, Queensland &
Past-President and Current Board Member,
The Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastics Surgeons (ASAPS)
Australian Health Journal segment
Filmed in Brisbane | March 2025
The newly established Australian and New Zealand Board of Cosmetic Plastic Surgery (ANZBCPS) has highlighted a concerning lack of confidence among cosmetic surgery patients in selecting qualified surgeons based on available online information. A January 2025 survey showed that 58% of respondents faced difficulties in finding the right surgeon, with 44% expressing mistrust in online resources. Furthermore, 27% were unsure about who is legally permitted to perform cosmetic surgery in Australia.
In response to these challenges, the ANZBCPS has introduced the Board Certified Program to ensure patients have access to trustworthy information about qualified surgeons. Participating surgeons may use the title “ANZBCPS Board Certified,” indicating they meet stringent quality and safety standards, and adhere to the continuing professional development (CPD) requirements set by AHPRA.
Eligibility criteria for ANZBCPS Board Certified surgeon:
- Successfully awarded the FRACS (Fellow of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons) following accredited plastic surgery training
- Registered as a specialist in the recognised speciality of plastic surgery by the
- AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) Regulation or the Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ)
- Membership of good standing on ASAPS or ASPS or NZAPS.
- Involved in the practice of cosmetic surgery
- Complete the CPD of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS).
- Nominate RACS as CPD home.
- Complete cosmetic surgery specific CPD as specified by the board
The program aims to help the public easily identify qualified cosmetic plastic surgeons committed to ethical practices and continuous training. Patients can search for certified surgeons through the official ANZBCPS website, ensuring that selected professionals are registered specialists with the necessary qualifications.
The ANZBCPS certification process ensures that surgeons maintain active practices in cosmetic surgery while complying with regulations, thereby fostering ongoing education and improvement. This initiative provides patients with confidence and peace of mind when choosing a cosmetic plastic surgeon, ultimately aiming to improve standards and trust within the field of cosmetic surgery.
Source: Adapted from media release (supplied)
You Might also like
-
Imperatives for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer
Professor Clare Scott, a pioneering clinician scientist at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Melbourne, also serves as a medical oncologist at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, the Royal Melbourne Hospital, and the Royal Women’s Hospital.
Her comprehensive training in medical oncology has fuelled her specialisation in gynaecological cancer, combining rigorous research with clinical trials to improve patient outcomes. With over a decade of involvement in ANZGOG, Australia’s foremost gynaecologic cancer research organisation, she is deeply committed to advancing research and saving lives.
-
Developing the next generation of medicines to target and enhance the microbiome
Australian Health Journal spoke to Associate Professor Sam Forster, Research Group Head
Microbiota and Systems Biology, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Team Leader, Australian Microbiome Culture Collection & Chief Scientific Officer, BiomeBank and Dr Sam Costello, Co-Founder and CEO of BiomeBank about the microbiome, partnering and some of the breakthroughs in recent years. -
Improved access to technology needed for people with Type 2 Diabetes needing insulin
The National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS) provides subsidised products for diabetes management; however, disparities exist in access to technology between those with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. While continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are subsidised for Type 1, they are not available for Type 2 diabetes. ADEA advocates for equitable access to these essential tools, emphasising that all individuals with diabetes deserve the resources necessary for optimal management and reduced risk of complications. Without such technologies, many are forced to rely on finger pricking, which can be inconvenient and unsafe in settings such as the workplace and in higher education.